ForeverInspired wrote:I've been really enjoying this vote for the best anime of the year. I've found so many new and great titles through it and have been able to get rid of others. This made me start thinking, and I was wondering whether it would be possible to see results from previous years side by side so that we don't have to search the forum and maybe provide links to the particular contest. Also, I'm not sure if this is a good idea, but maybe we could put in the reviews that the anime was a finalist/winner for the year. Just a thought. It might help other people out when looking for good anime. I know that it probably would be a lot of work, but I just thought that it might be nice to put the idea out there.
skreyola wrote:Well, for example, in this round, we have the SECOND season
Maokun wrote:...Also, I believe that the image uploading site I use has all the images I've made, meaning that potentially, I could post the placement of the top 16 anime of each year, if someone is interested.
MangaRocks! wrote:Maokun wrote:...Also, I believe that the image uploading site I use has all the images I've made, meaning that potentially, I could post the placement of the top 16 anime of each year, if someone is interested.
Well, I for one would definitely be interested.
skreyola wrote:MangaRocks! wrote:Maokun wrote:...Also, I believe that the image uploading site I use has all the images I've made, meaning that potentially, I could post the placement of the top 16 anime of each year, if someone is interested.
Well, I for one would definitely be interested.
Me, too.
Maokun wrote:Kokoro Connect 3
Library Wars: Wings of the Revolution 4
The problem with your logic is that you assume the only scenarios are "vote for rounds where you've seen both" and "vote for rounds where you've seen neither." I've voted in most rounds because I've usually seen at least one of the shows, or I've specifically been trying to game it like blkmage or other people.skreyola wrote:Well, for example, in this round, we have the SECOND season (I'm beginning to think tourneys shouldn't include sequels, but that's a topic for another time) of a well-known show that I've only seen the first season of, and if I just vote for the one that I'm more familiar with solely because more people have been talking about it, then I'm just perpetuating that bias toward the well-known, and if we all did that, all the shows that are already popular and well-known will win the tournaments, and the lesser-known gems will not place highly, and they'll continue to languish. So, it's kind of like wanting the more obscure shows to have a chance, and then maybe more people will go watch them, and maybe, if they're better than the more widely known show (I feel this was the case in a previous tournament), it'll have a better chance in a future tourney.
Maybe it's silly and baseless, but as I said, if I voted only in rounds where I'd seen both shows, I'd be out of the voting for most of the tourney, and Mao would have fewer votes to tally.
I love seeing people's reasoning for voting on a particular show, but there's always the chance someone will disagree with that reasoning. Y'know, it would be great if we voted solely on the basis of show merit, but then we'd all need to have seen all the shows. I don't have time for that (and am not interested in all the shows that made it into the brackets), so I'd be out of the voting entirely. So... as lame as it might be, I guess I'm using game theory like lots of other people.
Vii wrote:Bye Natsume ;_;
Return to Anime and Anime Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests