Postby Esoteric » Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:25 pm
<.< >.> Okay, where are the cookies?!
I'm surprised Jordan didn't take Joel out shopping for the clothes--for him to come wanting to spend time with his brother, then turn around and leave him alone for another hour or so just seemed, well...disconnected. Maybe that was your point. However, Jordan doesn't seem that disconnected the rest of the time. He buys exactly the sort of clothes his brother would like, after all.
Jordan's explosion over the sale of the guitar was a little shocking. There was no real sign of serious animosity or bickering between the two until that point. In essence, Jordan was acting with too much generosity and consideration. And Joel...Joel wasn't suspicious enough of his brother's visit for me to suspect there could be that sort of blow up argument. I could see Jordan fume silently and shake with bridled rage and bitter disappointment as he got up and walked away from his foolish brother, but not suddenly scream at him. For me to see a big blow up, I think Joel should have been far more resisting/defensive from the get go. Jordan should have needled him for being stubborn and frustrating as always. Then, just when Joel starts to loosen up and confesses his mistake, Jordan reacts with the angry disappointment Joel had been dreading all along. Cause and effect--the foreshadowed pattern of brotherly interactions a bit more fleshed out. That's my opinion anyway.
At the end of chapter 3 and into chapter 4, the story telling devolves primarily into dialog swapping between Jordan and Joel. No atmosphere, no real musings or insights on Joel's part other than the story about the recital as kids. It felt breezy compared to the opening chapters.
The last chapter. As another reviewer pointed out, it changes viewpoint without warning. In first person, viewpoint changes are pretty much a no-no, especially when it's just for one chapter. If after chapter four, you inserted a story break and then wrote four more chapters from January's perspective, then okay, you could probably get away with it. Maybe, maybe if you made it an 'epilogue', it could work as is, but then I'd suggest making it immediately clear (in the first sentence), that the narrator is no longer Joel.